The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc
The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc
Blog Article
However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice on the legal rights in the parties, arising out with the over marriage of the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of regulation. Read more
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which range depending on the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case legislation citation in the state court will not be ideal, or maybe accepted, within the U.
Should the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and commence according for the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it is actually practical for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got attained such stage. Read more
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Positions with DCFS.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It really is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
Any court may search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction might or get more info might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case regulation by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This could happen several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement on the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.